Optionally, it can merge a tree into the index, perform a fast-forward (i.e. 2-way) merge, or a 3-way merge, with the -m flag. When used with -m, the -u flag causes it to also update the files in the work tree with the result of the merge.
Trivial merges are done by git-read-tree itself. Only conflicting paths will be in unmerged state when git-read-tree returns.
That means that if you do a git-read-tree -m <newtree> followed by a git-checkout-index -f -u -a, the git-checkout-index only checks out the stuff that really changed.
This is used to avoid unnecessary false hits when git-diff-files is run after git-read-tree.
When two trees are specified, the user is telling git-read-tree the following:
I (index) H M Result ------------------------------------------------------- 0 nothing nothing nothing (does not happen) 1 nothing nothing exists use M 2 nothing exists nothing remove path from index 3 nothing exists exists use M clean I==H I==M ------------------ 4 yes N/A N/A nothing nothing keep index 5 no N/A N/A nothing nothing keep index 6 yes N/A yes nothing exists keep index 7 no N/A yes nothing exists keep index 8 yes N/A no nothing exists fail 9 no N/A no nothing exists fail 10 yes yes N/A exists nothing remove path from index 11 no yes N/A exists nothing fail 12 yes no N/A exists nothing fail 13 no no N/A exists nothing fail clean (H=M) ------ 14 yes exists exists keep index 15 no exists exists keep index clean I==H I==M (H!=M) ------------------ 16 yes no no exists exists fail 17 no no no exists exists fail 18 yes no yes exists exists keep index 19 no no yes exists exists keep index 20 yes yes no exists exists use M 21 no yes no exists exists failIn all "keep index" cases, the index entry stays as in the original index file. If the entry were not up to date, git-read-tree keeps the copy in the work tree intact when operating under the -u flag.
When this form of git-read-tree returns successfully, you can see what "local changes" you made are carried forward by running git-diff-index --cached $M. Note that this does not necessarily match git-diff-index --cached $H would have produced before such a two tree merge. This is because of cases 18 and 19 --- if you already had the changes in $M (e.g. maybe you picked it up via e-mail in a patch form), git-diff-index --cached $H would have told you about the change before this merge, but it would not show in git-diff-index --cached $M output after two-tree merge.
However, when you do git-read-tree with three trees, the "stage" starts out at 1.
This means that you can do
$ git-read-tree -m <tree1> <tree2> <tree3>and you will end up with an index with all of the <tree1> entries in "stage1", all of the <tree2> entries in "stage2" and all of the <tree3> entries in "stage3". When performing a merge of another branch into the current branch, we use the common ancestor tree as <tree1>, the current branch head as <tree2>, and the other branch head as <tree3>.
Furthermore, git-read-tree has special-case logic that says: if you see a file that matches in all respects in the following states, it "collapses" back to "stage0":
OK, this all sounds like a collection of totally nonsensical rules, but it's actually exactly what you want in order to do a fast merge. The different stages represent the "result tree" (stage 0, aka "merged"), the original tree (stage 1, aka "orig"), and the two trees you are trying to merge (stage 2 and 3 respectively).
The order of stages 1, 2 and 3 (hence the order of three <tree-ish> command line arguments) are significant when you start a 3-way merge with an index file that is already populated. Here is an outline of how the algorithm works:
When you start a 3-way merge with an index file that is already populated, it is assumed that it represents the state of the files in your work tree, and you can even have files with changes unrecorded in the index file. It is further assumed that this state is "derived" from the stage 2 tree. The 3-way merge refuses to run if it finds an entry in the original index file that does not match stage 2.
This is done to prevent you from losing your work-in-progress changes, and mixing your random changes in an unrelated merge commit. To illustrate, suppose you start from what has been committed last to your repository:
$ JC=`git-rev-parse --verify "HEAD^0"` $ git-checkout-index -f -u -a $JCYou do random edits, without running git-update-index. And then you notice that the tip of your "upstream" tree has advanced since you pulled from him:
$ git-fetch git://.... linus $ LT=`cat .git/FETCH_HEAD`Your work tree is still based on your HEAD ($JC), but you have some edits since. Three-way merge makes sure that you have not added or modified index entries since $JC, and if you haven't, then does the right thing. So with the following sequence:
$ git-read-tree -m -u `git-merge-base $JC $LT` $JC $LT $ git-merge-index git-merge-one-file -a $ echo "Merge with Linus" | \ git-commit-tree `git-write-tree` -p $JC -p $LTwhat you would commit is a pure merge between $JC and $LT without your work-in-progress changes, and your work tree would be updated to the result of the merge.
However, if you have local changes in the working tree that would be overwritten by this merge,git-read-tree will refuse to run to prevent your changes from being lost.
In other words, there is no need to worry about what exists only in the working tree. When you have local changes in a part of the project that is not involved in the merge, your changes do not interfere with the merge, and are kept intact. When they do interfere, the merge does not even start (git-read-tree complains loudly and fails without modifying anything). In such a case, you can simply continue doing what you were in the middle of doing, and when your working tree is ready (i.e. you have finished your work-in-progress), attempt the merge again.